|

It is my hope that each month we will have the pleasure of "hearing"
from a variety of our members of the presbytery. I will be inviting
many of you to contribute to the "Monthly Message". This
month I have chosen to share the sermon that the Rev. Jill Minnich
preached at the Winter Stated Meeting of the Presbytery of Utah
in St. George. Pastor Minnich's sermon is titled "Doing Church"
and it's powerful. Thank you Jill for sharing with us. Blessings,
Carolyn
Scripture: John 15:11-17 and Acts 2:42-47
I have a love affair with words - new words, old words, new words
with new meaning, old words with new meanings-I love them all. My
mother would tell you that right after I finished reading allthe
Winnie the Pooh books, I picked up the Webster's Dictionary and
read it from A to Z. And who am I to argue with my mother?
One of the things that fascinates me about language is the way
it changes and grown with the times. back in the 19th and 20th centures,
we invented the words capitalism and communism, socialism and fascism
to describe new economic and political realities brought about by
the Industrial Revolution. And there's another new word! How about
lunar expeditionary module or LEM as NASA likes to call it? And
NASA is a relatively new word, itself. The new words we invent reflect
changes in our social, political, and technological lives. And there
is a group of people who keep track of the growth and change in
our bocabulary-the American Dialect Society.
Each year the American Dialect Society lists the new words for
that calendar year and they pick one word to be 'The Word of the
Year'. Do you know what the word of the year for 2007 was? Googleganger.
That's right-and don't forget to spell it with an umlaut. A googleganer
is a person with your name who shows up when you are googling yourself.
We have words that come and go in the church as well. Lately, one
of the hot phrases has been "doing church". As in, lets
"do church together". Or, we "do church on Sundays
and Thursdays". And, we "do church at 23rd and Jefferson.
Where do you do church?" Most of the times, it seems to be
taking the place of the phrase "go to church". The question
is, does it mean the same thing as "go to church" or does
it mean something a little different? Or, does it mean something
very different?
As, I think about it, "doing church" has some obvious
advantages to "going to church". Going to church seems
to imply that church is a place. For many people, I suspect, going
to church is much like going to the Jazz game or to the movies.
Church is a place to go and watch what is happening in front of
you. You may clap politely or cheer happily if you like what is
happening. But you all sit in your assigned seat and you expect
to enjoy the program and then go home again. Until the next time,
you go to church.
Doing church, on the other hand, seems to mean that church is something
I do, not a performance that I attend. there is activity and involvement
in doing church. When I do church, I become part of the performance
of church. We, Americans, like doing things. We make to do lists
and love to check things off our lists as we do them. We know we've
accomplished something when the job is done. "Doing church"
fits nicely with our American task-oriented predilection for action.
Yes, there seem to be some advantages to doing church over going
to church. Of course, there's still the question of wht is it we're
doing when we do church. It seems to me that what we do when we
do church is the truly essential thing. Is it something i would
want to invite my friends to do with me? I mean, most of the people
I know already have plenty to do. They have one or two jobs, housecleaning,
laundry, yard work, car repairs, snow removal, and children and
then they volunteer-very few of them need another thing to do. Doing
church would have to be something pretty special to make it onto
their already pretty full 'to do' list!
So what is it we're supposed to be dling when we do church? First
of all, I certainly hope that doing church means more than an hour
of worship one day a week. If that's all doing church means, we
might as well be going to church for all the difference that makes.
Singing some contemporary Christian music and throwing lyrics, pictures,
and Scripture up on a big screen in a multimeadia show doesn't really
differ from going to church except in style and technology to my
ming. I've gotta hope that doing church means something a lot more
than that!
Secondly, doing church can't be all about doing our duty. Jesus
relieved us of that notion once and for all when he said, "I
no longer call you servants because servants don't understand what
their master is thinging and planning. No, I call you my friends..."
Servants do their duty. they do what they're told to do the way
they've been told to do ti. they don't get fancy. they don't get
creative. They follow orders because that's their job. Friends are
different-friends form relationships. Friends for partnerships.
Friends work together not oly because they share a common goal,
but because they share a common bond. Working together, growing
and changing, discussing and debating, friends find the best way
to get the job done using their different talents and abilities.
And friends find joy in the going because working together strengthens
and deepens the relationship. Friends will give you the shirt off
their back or put their lives on the line. Most of us don't need
any more duties, but we sure could use another Friend. Or two or
three.
So, if we're not simply doing worship or doing our duty when we
do church, what exactly is it that we are doing? At the risk of
sounding like a radical, we could look to Acts to see what doing
church means. In the verse just preceding this morning's passage
(Acts 2:42-47), we find what could be considered a concise summary
of what doing church meant to those who had followed Jesus during
his life: "They committed themselves to the teaching of the
apostles, taking part in fellowship and sharing the common meal,
and the prayers.
Luke begins with teaching, as one of the marks of doing church.
While this teaching undoubtedly relied heavily on the continued
proclamation of the gospel, it also entails something more. The
apostles' task is to take a community that had witnessed the power
of Pentecost and help it understand what that experience demands
of the church. The apostles seek to answer the question of where
the church must go next. Instead of fueling a continual wildfire
experience, the apostles' teaching and their listeners' devotion
allows faith to remain ablaze, but controlled, so that others may
see it, approach it, and be warmed-possibly even ignited-byit. There
is an od adage: The place for the fire is in the fireplace. The
apostles' teaching was the church's fireplace.
There's another old adage that comes to mind as well, "Those
who can, do, those who can't, teach." That has never been less
true than in the church. The first teachers Luke identifies are
the apostles themselves. Their teachers, of course, were none other
than Jesus and the Holy Spirit. Few woudl accuse Jesus, or the Spirit,
or any of th apostles, for that matter, of not being "do-ers".
Read through the stories found in Acts and you will discover how
often the teaching of the apostles was accompanied by acts of charity,
by healing and other signs and miracles. As the friends of Jesus,
the apostles were judged by what they did for those in their world
who were obviously in need. One of the marks of the church is that
those who teach, DO!
The second mark Acts notes is fellowship, or koinonia. This is
the church's ability to embody the command to "love one another'>
As Acts implies this kind of love is unique within the Christian
community. It is "the love which the father showed in sending
the Son, the love which the Son showed in laying down his life".
This incarnational love flows out of the life of Christ and serves
and sacrifices for the lost world.
Teachin is a forward-looking, even a next-generation, activity.
But the seeds sowed by the apostles'teaching need fertile soil in
which to germinate. Thus, it is that Luke next highlights-what is
arguably the most special gift the Holy Spirit bestowed on these
new believers-the ability to become a true fellowship (koinonia)
community. earlier in chapter 2, Luke clearly describes just how
diverse this group actually was (2:5). Yet theynow find themselves
able to form an enduring, cohesive community. It is the ongoing
acceptance and celebration of this koinonia fellowship that makes
it possible for them to continue to experience "wonders and
signs" (v.43) instead of dissolving into a bickering band of
complainers and critics.
The unique nature of this fellowship is evident in verses 44-45.
This fellowship bonds the people together so tightly that they willingly
give up their individual economic goals and personal budgets in
order to support the whoe group ("they sell their possessions
and goods and distribute the proceeds to all as any had need").
The believers are so on fire with their faith and fellowship that
they joyfully burn all those labels marked "mine". Indeed,
this first example of faith and fellowship gives a special depth
of meaning to the term koinonia, a meaning that will challenge all
later generations of Christian communities.
Gut koinonia, love lived out, can easily turn into waht C. Peter
Wagner has aptly diagnosed as "koinonitis". Wagner describes
this illness as when "interpersonal relationship becomes so
deep and mutually absorbing all church activity becomes introverted".
When the church suffers from "koinonitis", it turns in
on itself and loses sight of the very prupose for which the fellowshipping
community exists.
The third mark of doing church, according to Acts, is the common
meal. Boy howdy, do we have that one down. Or do we? This common
meal wasn't just any old Presbyterian potluck. This meal was something
much more-it was a form of charity and of witness.
One of the primary ways these new believers continue to practice
community-mindedness is at table-breaking bread together. Since
humanity's earliest tribal days, eating together has functioned
as far more than simply a collective effort to get rid of hunger
pangs. Throughout history, the pangs of solitude, insecurity and
loneliness haave also found their ease at the common table. A person
was never more vulnerable that when at table. Before gathering around
a table, weapons had to be taken off and laid aside.
Jesus himself provided a clear model of witnessing through eating
and drinking. Many of Jesus' most poignant messages and his sharpest
denouncements came while he was at table with one group or another.
Jesus not only broke bread with any and all types of people. He
usually broke through the protective shells of his table companions
at the same time. Meal times with Jesus meant soul food as well
as body food.
Jesus was heavily criticized for having the wrong kinds of friends
at table with him-either they were too rich or too poor, too holy
or not holy enough. But Jesus' eaxample perfectly reflected the
kind of community that now found itself gathered together for everyday
sustenance, solace and support. Drawn from diverse lands, with different
foods and languages, different dining traditions and customs, meal
times could have been one of the most difficult and divisive events
in this new community's life. Instead, we find in verse 46 that
they celebrated their meals "with glad and generous hearts'.
This meal was truly something more.
Finally, doing church means prayer. The new Christ-body community
prays together. All those from the Jewish tradition already have
been steeped in a daily ritual of dveotions. Verso 46 reveals that
these new Christians still attend the temple for daily study and
prayer. Thus, while so much about their lives and faith is new,
these early Christians still continue to abide by some longstanding,
traditional modes of coming into the presence of God.
This kind of prayer becomes both the giving and the receiving of
the Word. Pershps the most basic exercise of faith that helped to
keep the early church fit for its witnessing mission was its communal
commitment to prayer. In prayer the church could confess the faith
vital to its identity, "Jesus is Lord". This confession
was one of the earliest rallying points of the church as well as
its defining creed. The prayers of the post-Pentecost church declared
Jesus to be Lord of all people, of all the earth. Prayer was not
a spiritual retreat from the world, but instead the church's way
of coming together, of believing and doing, of claiming the whole
world for Christ.
The question for us has to be-are we up to the challenge? Can we
do church in ways that teaches and preaches, that welcomes and nourishes,
that proclaims that Jesus is Lord and claims everyone and everything
for Christ? Many people would say unequivocally,'No!'
I'm sure you've read the same studies I have. They say quite clearly
that while most folks like Jesus, they do not like the church. As
far as they are concerned, we're doing it all wrong. With apologies
to my buddy Larry Boy and his priate friends, most people hear us
singing,
We're the Christians who don't do anything. We just sit in our
pews and frown. And if you ask us to do anything, we'll tell you
we're the Christians who don't do anything
But that's not the song that they expect us to be singing and it's
not the song they want us to be singing. What they expect is,
Come on in, boys, sit right down and make yourself at home.....
Frineds, when we sing a song of welcome to thehip-hop rapper's
with their drooping shorts and tattoos, when we sit down to learn
with the single moms and are so exhausted from a week of work and
non-stop parenting athatjust getting their kids to church is an
extreme sport, when we listen to and learn from the folks who don't
speak English and the folks who got their GED at night...when we
sit at table with folks who prefer rice and beans, or udon and dried
fish, or lentils and green beans or eat with their fingers..when
we prya with people who self-medicate, who cut themselves, whose
children are in jail, or who cheat on their taxes...maybe then we
will have started to do church right.
Andy what happened while these apoltles and disciples, slaves and
merchants, zealots and tax-collectors, fishermen and woemn, were
doing church? Everyone around was in awe-all those wonders and signs
done through the apostles. People in general liked what they was.
Every day their number grew as God added to those who where being
saved.
Okay, fine. Let's do church. But, firneds, let's do it right.

On April 18th, Pastor Neal Humphrey, Westminster Church in Fruit
Heights, was honored by the Trapper Trails Council of the Boy
Scouts of America with the Silver Beaver Award.
The April issuse of Presbyterian Today has a article written
by John A. Lindquist II, member at First Presbyterian Church,
Ogden, about Dr. Richard P. Minnich. The title of the article
is 'Are Christians Mormon?' Good reading.
An Interim Pastor Education seminar is being held at Zephyr Point
Conference Center in Lake Tahoe, NV July 13-18, 2008. For more
information, please contact the presbytery office.
Zephyr Point Conference Center, Lake Tahoe, NV is sponsoring
a Pastor's Conference October 27-30, 2008. Brochures are available
in the presbytery office.
|